- The assignment
- Organize the technical material into a response addressing the published requirements.
- The writing
- Distinguish existing capability from proposed development and describe how the proposed demonstration would be evaluated.
- The supporting work
- Explain the evidence needed to assess the results, the operating limits and the proposed work.
Examples of our work
Funding plans and proposal writing.
Anonymous descriptions of work we prepared, with the findings, unresolved facts and next actions made clear.
Solution brief and pitch deck
Anonymized writing engagement
For a technology company, we prepared a solution brief and pitch deck for a federal evaluation.
What this description shows
The assignment required both a clear document structure and a distinction between supported capability and proposed work. The description establishes what we prepared, without claiming government selection or award.
Client documents and identifying details are not reproduced here.
Free funding plan: research fit
Anonymized actual free funding plan
Pursue a limited research-fit check
- What we found
- The published capability provides a starting point, but an unresolved research problem and a relevant program need have not been established.
- What remains open
- A commercial capability alone does not establish research fit. Eligibility and funding remain unconfirmed.
- Recommended action
- Identify a limitation worth investigating, then confirm the program fit and applicant route before preparing a proposal.
Free funding plan: partner-led process study
Anonymized actual free funding plan
Partner, subject to confirming an application
- What we found
- Published product documentation supports investigating a limited process study. It does not establish approval for a different use.
- What remains open
- An application owner, comparative evidence and genuine development work remain unverified.
- Recommended action
- Identify a non-confidential process worth testing and the organization that would use the result before commissioning a proposal.
These summaries are adapted from free funding plans we sent, using public-source research. Names, figures and identifying project details have been removed. The original plans contain dated source references; identifying references are omitted here. These are examples of the analysis, not client testimonials or award results.
Public-source and illustrative examples
The homepage includes a dated TI-27 public research example showing how a published clarification changes the route and the evidence requested.
The writing page includes an annotated hypothetical draft based on a public FAQ. Its proposed team and draft are illustrative, not client work.
These separate examples demonstrate method without publishing private documents.
Get a decision for your own notice
The free funding plan covers one company and one opportunity, with source links. One page showing whether the notice fits (pursue, partner or pass), the project we would propose in the agency’s terms, what it would take, and the next step.
Your free funding plan arrives within one business day of a complete request. If an essential detail is missing, we ask within one business day. No meeting or purchase is required.
Get my free funding plan